Another Indiana judge is raising a stink over odor in the court.
Judge Patricia Riley
Indiana Court of Appeals Judge Patricia Riley has joined a colleague in objecting to the "repugnant stench" they say is coming from court documents handled by the Indiana Attorney General's office.
"The fact that all three of these malodorous records were handled by the same Deputy Attorney General prompts us to direct this third entreaty to the Office of the Attorney General with the demand that our request for clean, unscented records be heeded," Riley wrote in a recent case footnote.
...
Previously, Appeals Court Judge Edward Najam also expressed displeasure with an "offensive" and "unpleasant" odor similar to cigarette smoke coming from court documents handled by the attorney general's office.
Bryan Corbin, spokesman for the attorney general, said smoking is not permitted and does not happen inside the agency's offices. He said the records in the case that came before Riley were filed before Najam raised his objections and that changes have been made.
"The assumption that respect for the judiciary can be won by shielding judges from published criticism wrongly appraises the character of American public opinion....[A]n enforced silence, however limited, solely in the name of preserving the dignity of the bench, would probably engender resentment, suspicion, and contempt much more than it would enhance respect." Justice Hugo Black, Bridges v. California (1951)
Thursday, December 18, 2014
Indiana Appellate Judge Smells Attorney's Briefs, Finds Odor Offensive
The Indianapolis Star reports:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)